Enemies of Mimetic Essence: Lacoue-Labarthe As we can see, Derrida clearly regards mimesis as representation, although mimetic representation has no. Deleuze and Lacoue-Labarthe on the Reversal of Platonism: The Mimetic Abyss. David Lane. Among Friedrich Nietzsche’s many daring philosophical declara-. Renaissance world, as Lacoue-Labarthe suggests) and has nothing to do with the role of mimesis in musical expression. It concerns, rather, a question of.
|Published (Last):||3 December 2015|
|PDF File Size:||11.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The second, intertwined with the first, is in fact instrumental in stimulating the rigor with which the first develops. Derrida wishes to deconstruct both the notion of the original story and the copy-version. Doubling in Girardian thought is the process of becoming more and more identical through desiring the other.
When this self-effacement becomes too dominant, it seems to stem from academic rivalry. Every copy which is not direct copying brings with it lacoud-labarthe supplemental. Representational mimesis is secondary, dependent on the formative effects of mimetic desire. Derrida is far from being a positivist.
Philosopher, literary critic, translator of Nietzsche and BenjaminPhilippe Lacoue-Labarthe is one of the leading intellectual figures in France. Mimesis can be seen as a tool in breaking down logocentric thinking. This does not mean that there is copying without innovation; it means that writing is an intertextual game, without beginning and without end.
This is, as we have seen, clearly an exaggeration. The evil and the outside, the expulsion of the evil, its exclusion out of the body and out of the city ….
Philippe Lacoue-Labarthesubjectal lossliteraturemimesisrepresentationpresentationphilosophysubject. Thus Derrida is lacoke-labarthe with originality. The essence in every repetition is, according to Deleuze, non-mediated difference. According to Girard, Western thought has tried to efface the trace of the founding violence.
The problem arises when mimesis is seen devoid of its desiring nature. A fiercer critique of acquisitive mimesis is found in Lacoue-Labarthe’s work. Sticking Heidegger with a Stela: Mimesis in the Works of Girard and Derrida. When compared to Auerbach’s understanding of mimesis, however, Derrida and other deconstructionists have been more eager to analyse and interpret mimesis as a concept and phenomenon.
When everything depends upon mimesis there can be no innovation outside imitation. As we have seen, Girard operates with a concept of doubling, one which takes place only in the later phases of mimetic desire.
Philosopher, literary critic, translator of Nietzsche and BenjaminPhilippe Lacoue-Labarthe is one of the leading intellectual figures in France. Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe teaches at the University momesis Strasbourg.
They do not dismiss mimesis as representation, but they do emphasize two distinct lacuoe-labarthe in mimesis: Mimesis is a kind of productive force in the writing of texts, as every text is an imitation of previous texts. Derrida and the Deconstruction of Mimesis. In this respect mimetic theory is branded metaphysical and in need of having its own concept of mimesis deconstructed. Mimetic essence must therefore mean something floating and undefinable.
Typography — Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Christopher Fynsk | Harvard University Press
In this respect there is a scapegoating of the new, the different, which, through mimetic shifts, changes and acquires new forms. Lacoue-lanarthe is Pre-Representational As we have seen, Girard operates with a concept of doubling, one which takes place only in the later phases of mimetic desire. Stanford University Press Amazon. Desire has a tendency to turn people into doubles as they become more and more afflicted by the same desires.
Sign in to use this feature. On the other hand, there is enormous scope within the deconstructionist project for destructing the philosophic and theological tradition, even for attempting to mimesos the metaphysics of the humanistic sciences as a whole.
Life seems to be devoid of anything originary, and of any inherent qualities.
Girard belongs to the thinkers who believe that there are qualitative truths to be found, and it does not matter if these are found through dismissing or neglecting the boundaries between philosophy, anthropology, literature and theology. Lacoue-Labarthe As we can see, Derrida clearly regards mimesis as representation, although mimetic representation has no definitive essence attached to it. Everything begins with representation.
According to deconstructionist theory, mimesis dissolves existing orders and hierarchies. Comment  “Typography is a book whose importance has not diminished since its first publication in French in This volume of six essays deals with the relation between philosophy and aesthetics, particularly the role of mimesis in a metaphysics of representation, and is introduced by Jacques Derrida.
Thus the scapegoat becomes a decisive factor in human development. Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Derrida has no starting point, no primary force whatsoever, and it seems as though his working aim is merely to find tensions, contradictions, and heterogeneity, while Girard works within the realm of synthesis, bringing together central themes such as mimesis, scapegoating and violence into one theory.
Girard is preoccupied with origins.